Introduction

Acoustic Neural Field Imaging (ANFI) is a hypothetical brain imaging modality that aims to noninvasively detect fast neural activity by using ultrasound to sense tiny mechanical vibrations in the brain. The idea is that when neurons fire action potentials, their membranes undergo slight mechanical movements and generate pressure waves in surrounding tissue. ANFI would use high-frequency ultrasound sensors arranged around the head to detect these tiny changes and translate them into maps of neural activity. This technology would show brain electrical activity, potentially achieving high temporal and spatial resolution without needing to use electrodes. In this report, we discuss what ANFI would measure, how the equipment might be designed, the nature of the data produced, key limitations and challenges, and the new research that could be made with this idea.

Page 2 visual content
Page 2 visual content

What Would It Measure?

ANFI would measure the tiny mechanical deformations that occur in neuronal membranes during action potentials. When a neuron fires, ion fluxes and voltage changes cause the membrane to move by a few nanometers. Early experiments showed that action potentials are accompanied by small diameter changes in invertebrate axons, typically around 0.3 to 5 nm. (Hill et al.,1977) used laser interferometry to detect about a 0.3 nm expansion in a crayfish giant axon during a spike, providing some of the earliest quantitative measurements of these movements. More recent interferometric imaging has confirmed similar nanometer scale displacements in mammalian cells (Ling et al., 2020). These movements arise from electromechanical coupling in the membrane, where changes in voltage alter membrane tension and shape.

The mechanical motion of the membrane produces a small pressure wave in the surrounding tissue. Models predict roughly 1 nm membrane displacement during each action potential, which generates an acoustic pulse that travels through intracellular and extracellular fluid. ANFI would detect these pressure changes using ultrasound sensors placed around the head.

Measuring these mechanical traces provides a direct window into neural firing, unlike fMRI, which measures slow blood-flow changes, or EEG, which reflects large-scale electrical fields. Because each action potential produces a brief mechanical “shake,” ANFI could potentially track neural activity at sub-millisecond timescales and with spatial detail beyond what surface electrical recordings allow. Earlier studies on axonal swelling and fast nerve expansion support the idea that mechanical signals consistently accompany electrical activity, which ANFI would take advantage of to map brain activity noninvasively.

Page 3 visual content
Page 3 visual content
Page 4 visual content
Page 4 visual content

System Design and Equipment Architecture

To capture brain wide acoustic signals from neural activity, ANFI would use specialized ultrasound instrumentation, likely in the form of a wearable transducer array. The device would resemble an ultrasound helmet containing many transducers positioned around the head, each capable of emitting focused pulses and receiving returning echoes. Recent advances in transcranial ultrasound make this design realistic. For example, a 256 element helmet shaped array operating at about 0.5 MHz has been developed for noninvasive neuromodulation and imaging in humans (Martin et al., 2025). This system uses piezoelectric transducers arranged in a semi ellipsoidal bowl filled with a water coupling medium to transmit sound through the skull. The head is stabilized with a face mask and frame to maintain alignment. ANFI would likely follow a similar layout, using a dense array of elements to capture acoustic signals from multiple angles.

The ultrasound array would operate in pulse echo mode to scan the brain’s volume. It would function similarly to ultrafast ultrasound systems that use multiple channels to send brief bursts of high frequency sound, typically between 250 and 700 kHz, through the skull. Frequency selection creates a trade off. Higher frequencies above 1 MHz provide better spatial resolution but are heavily attenuated by bone, while lower frequencies around 250 to 500 kHz penetrate the skull more effectively but give lower resolution. For transcranial applications, mid range frequencies offer the best balance between penetration and image clarity (O’Reilly and Hynynen, 2012; White et al., 2006). Systems operating near 500 to 600 kHz can achieve focal spots only a few millimeters wide in deep brain tissue. After each pulse, echoes return to the array and are converted into electrical signals. Small shifts in echo phase or frequency indicate subtle tissue movement that could reflect neural vibrations.

ANFI is designed as a fully non-invasive, wearable device, most likely in the form of a helmet or cap connected to external electronics. Current ultrasound helmets are bulky and require head stabilization, but future versions could use flexible arrays or modular panels that better conform to the scalp. The system may not be lightweight at first, but it could still be portable and usable at the bedside. It would require no implants, genetic modification, magnetic fields, or radioactive tracers, making it safer and more accessible than many existing brain imaging methods. A battery powered version may also be possible with further advances in efficiency.

Page 5 visual content
Page 5 visual content
Page 6 visual content
Page 6 visual content

What Would the Data Look Like?

The data produced by ANFI would be very much like a movie of the brain’s activity. Each frame of the movie is an ultrasound image (or slice) of the brain, where pixel intensities indicate blood flow strength or another activity-related signal. When neurons in a region become active, the subsequent increase in local blood volume causes a stronger ultrasound Doppler signal from that area (Rabut et al. 2021). Over the time course of a stimulus or task, one would see certain regions in the ultrasound images light up (become brighter in Doppler power) relative to baseline, indicating increased neural activity there. By acquiring frames in rapid succession, ANFI can capture the dynamics of these changes. For example, which brain areas activate first and how the activity spreads or fluctuates.

In technical terms, the raw data are often stored as power Doppler images. These are processed images computed from the backscattered echoes of the ultrasound pulses, after filtering out static tissue signals. What remains is primarily the signal from moving red blood cells, quantified as Doppler power that correlates with cerebral blood volume (Rabut et al. 2021). A series of such images over time can be analyzed to produce maps of brain activation. The spatial resolution of current ANFI (fUS) systems is around 100 × 100 × 300 μm for a 2D imaging plane at 15 MH (Rabut et al. 2021), which is fine enough to resolve small vascular units like cortical columns. If multiple 2D slices are acquired or a 2D matrix transducer is used, 3D volumetric data can be obtained. Recent demonstrations have shown that nearly whole-brain 3D imaging in small animals is possible by using matrix arrays (with many more ultrasound elements and channels) and scanning very fast. These 3D datasets can reveal functional activity throughout the brain volume, not just in a single slice.

It’s important to note that the temporal aspect of the data is limited by biology: the blood flow changes do not happen instantaneously when neurons fire. There is typically a delay of a few hundred milliseconds for blood flow to increase after neural activity, and the peak of the response might be ~1 second after a burst of neuron firing (Deffieux et al. 2018) ANFI captures this hemodynamic response. So while the imaging system might acquire frames at, say, 10 frames per second (100 ms per frame), the actual neural signal it’s measuring (blood volume changes) is smeared over a second or more by the neurovascular coupling process (Deffieux et al. 2018). Researchers often account for this by correlating the timing of stimuli or neural events with the slowly rising ultrasound signal. Despite the lag, the high frame rate of ultrasound is still beneficial because it improves sensitivity (by averaging many frames you get better signal-to-noise) and it can capture subtle transient events that slower frame rates would miss. In summary, ANFI data consists of high-resolution ultrasonic images or volumes over time, which are analyzed to extract when and where neural activity (inferred from blood flow or other acoustic signals) occurred.

Page 7 visual content
Page 7 visual content

Limitations

Despite its potential, ANFI faces several major limitations. One of the most significant is skull attenuation. The skull absorbs and scatters ultrasound, making it difficult to detect faint signals originating deep in the brain. Higher frequencies provide better spatial resolution but penetrate the skull poorly, forcing a trade-off between clarity and depth (O’Brien, 2007). Another challenge is the extremely small size of the neural mechanical signals. Nanometre-scale movements are close to the noise floor of typical ultrasound systems, and they occur in a living environment full of other mechanical activity, such as heartbeat, breathing, blood flow, and tiny head motions. Recent interferometric work emphasizes how careful one must be to separate actual neural deformations from various mechanical and optical artifacts (Ling et al., 2020). This means ANFI would require very sensitive sensors, low-noise electronics, and sophisticated analysis methods to distinguish neural signals from background noise. The engineering is also demanding: building and calibrating a helmet with hundreds of ultrasound channels, each with precise timing, and then processing all of that data in real time is a significant hardware and software challenge. On top of that, safety limits on ultrasound intensity must be respected to avoid heating or other bioeffects in brain tissue, which restricts how much power can be used to boost signal strength (O’Brien, 2007).

Applications

Despite these obstacles, ANFI could be very powerful if it becomes feasible. By targeting mechanical signatures tied directly to action potentials, it could provide a way to study brain activity with both wide coverage and high temporal resolution. For example, it could help researchers investigate how signals spread through distributed networks during perception, decision making, or memory encoding, in much finer temporal detail than fMRI allows. In clinical contexts, ANFI might help locate the onset zone of epileptic seizures more precisely than EEG, without requiring invasive electrodes. It might also support future brain computer interfaces by providing a noninvasive way to read out fast neural patterns that can be decoded into control signals. The concept shows how combining knowledge from electrophysiology, neuronal mechanics, and ultrasound physics could lead to a new type of brain imaging. While ANFI remains hypothetical and faces real physical and technical limits, it outlines a plausible future direction in which we do not just measure the brain’s electricity or blood flow, but also its subtle mechanical “voice” as neurons fire.

References

  1. Deffieux, T., Demene, C., Pernot, M., & Tanter, M. (2018). Functional ultrasound neuroimaging: a review of the preclinical and clinical state of the art. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 50, 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2018.02.001
  2. Hill, B. C., Schubert, E. D., Nokes, M. A., & Michelson, R. P. (1977). Laser interferometer measurement of changes in crayfish axon diameter concurrent with action potential. Science (New York, N.Y.), 196 (4288), 426–428. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.850785
  3. Ling, T., Boyle, K. C., Zuckerman, V., Flores, T., Ramakrishnan, C., Deisseroth, K., & Palanker, D. (2020). High-speed interferometric imaging reveals dynamics of neuronal deformation during the action potential. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117 (19), 10278–10285. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920039117
  4. Martin, E., Roberts, M., Grigoras, I. F., Wright, O., Nandi, T., Rieger, S. W., Campbell, J., den Boer, T., Cox, B. T., Stagg, C. J., & Treeby, B. E. (2025). Ultrasound system for precise neuromodulation of human deep brain circuits. Nature Communications, 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63020-1
  5. OBRIENJR, W. (2007). Ultrasound–biophysics mechanisms ☆. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 93 (1-3), 212–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.07.010
  6. O’Reilly, M. A., & Hynynen, K. (2012). Blood-Brain Barrier: Real-time Feedback-controlled Focused Ultrasound Disruption by Using an Acoustic Emissions–based Controller. Radiology, 263 (1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11111417
  7. Rabut, C., Yoo, S., Hurt, R. C., Jin, Z., Li, H., Guo, H., Ling, B., & Shapiro, M. G. (2020). Ultrasound Technologies for Imaging and Modulating Neural Activity. Neuron, 108 (1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.003
  8. White, P. J., Clement, G. T., & Hynynen, K. (2006). Longitudinal and shear mode ultrasound propagation in human skull bone. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 32 (7), 1085–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.03.015